Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. She is currently on leave.
More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero � all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

The War on Administrative Costs

By Megan McArdle
Dec 9 2009, 1:23 PM ET Comment

Commenter R. J. Lehmann says:

Actually, the single biggest change among the details of the proposal that have been revealed thus far is the change in the minimum medical loss ratio from 85% to 90%. 85% would be a tough hurdle for most companies, because generally speaking, a 15% administrative ratio (your costs for marketing, technology, regulatory compliance, fraud monitoring, staff salaries, etc.) is industry standard. But there are a few insurers with administrative ratios in the low single digits, and they would stand benefit competitively -- add your administrative ratio + 85%, substract from 100%, and that's your margin.

90%, on the other hand, just won't happen. Nobody, for-profit or non-profit, puts up administrative ratios below 10%. 




I'm all for efficiency, but the obsession with administrative cost ratios is getting completely out of hand--not just in health care, but also in charities.  Sure, there are bloated bureaucracies that cost too much--but there are also good managers that save money.  The percentage of income devoted to administration is not a very good guide to which kind you have encountered--after all, the more effective managers are at reducing other expenses, the more administration will grow as a percentage of total expenditure.  In this vein, while slashing administrative costs is one way to deal with demands for a lower overhead percentage, another way is to inflate your other costs.

It's gotten to the point where no one wants to fund overhead in charities--they want their money to go to "useful purposes".  But even the leanest charity cannot operate without staff, offices, computers, and so forth, and starving those for resources is not "useful work".  

Similarly, the correct loss ratio for insurance companies is not 100%, any more than Google would be a more effective company if it fired everyone at headquarters and spent every penny on programmers and servers.  This kind of mindless ratcheting is like those fine fellows who think that if one splash of cologne is alluring, eight splashes must be even sexier.

Then he gets all surprised when the targets of his attention slowly choke to death.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The $630-Million Trees That Sparked a Social Media Revolt in China The $630-Million Trees That Sparked an Online Revolt
The Brash Hypocrisy of Lanny Davis This Man Represents Everything Wrong in Washington
Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice
Obama Needs to Articulate a Second-Term Agenda What Would Obama Do With Four More Years?
Chris Matthews and Newt Gingrich: The Most Entertaining (and Reptile-Centric) Political Interview Ever Gingrich Meets Matthews: A Reptile-Centric Interview

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why You Can’t Get a Taxi

And how an upstart company may change that

Europe’s Real Crisis

The Continent’s problems are as much demographic as financial. They won’t go away soon.

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…