Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. She is currently on leave.
More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero � all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

Tax Increase or Wage Increase?

By Megan McArdle
Dec 8 2009, 5:22 PM ET Comment

One of the putative benefits of the excise tax on high-cost insurance plans is that those who are subject to it will perceive it not as a tax increase, but as a wage increase.  The mechanism by which it is actually supposed to raise money is not by collecting taxes on people who receive lavish health benefits.  Rather, the idea is that employers will cut benefits, pass on the savings to their workers in the form of wages, and the employees, in turn, will pay more in taxes than they otherwise would have.





The thing's completely unfalsifiable, of course.  And I've had at least one expert express worry that this ceiling could ultimately become a floor--that employers will get used to holding their benefits right under the level at which the excise tax comes in, even if there are secular declines in health care costs.  But the theory behind it is basically sound.

So the question is, how do workers experience this?  Are they happy because their wages get a boost, or sad because their health benefits get cut?

It depends on whether you think people value the health benefits they get at approximately what it costs their employers.  I am the last person to see corporate HR departments as fonts of all-wise administrative efficiency.  On the other hand, a lot of these policies are held by union workers, whose memberships all know pretty well exactly the tradeoffs they are making between pay and benefits.  Because they have collective bargaining every few years, they are well aware that they have to give up wages to get health care.  The fact is that though health care wonks may deplore it, people love to be insulated from even the most trivial health care costs.

The other thing to consider is that even if people don't value their health benefits at the full cost of the policy, the income tax means they lose 20-40% of every dollar that is taken out of health benefits and passed on in the form of wages.  So what people are likely to see is a fairly substantial benefit cut, and a fairly small wage increase.

Democrats are betting that they'll focus on the wage increase.  I'm not so sure.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Obama Needs to Articulate a Second-Term Agenda What Would Obama Do With Four More Years?
The '7 Dirty Words' Turn 40, but They're Still Dirty The '7 Dirty Words' Turn 40
50 Cent Endorses Marriage Equality; Wonders Why There's No 'White History Month' 50 Cent's Mixed Gay Marriage Endorsement
Silicon Valley's Next Big Thing: Beer Silicon Valley's Next Big Thing: Beer
The Revenge of the Rust Belt: How the Midwest Got Its Groove Back The Revenge of the Rust Belt

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why You Can’t Get a Taxi

And how an upstart company may change that

Europe’s Real Crisis

The Continent’s problems are as much demographic as financial. They won’t go away soon.

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…