Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. She is currently on leave.
More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero � all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

Do We Need a War Tax?

By Megan McArdle
Dec 2 2009, 2:44 PM ET Comment

Liberal doves are in favor of a plan put forward by Congressman Obey for a "war surtax" to fund our further adventures in Afghanistan.  Opposition to it in Congress--including from Democrats--means it's unlikely to get to the floor, much less pass.  Most of the conservative bloggers I've seen hate it.  But it strikes me as an entirely sensible idea, with one modification.

To reiterate a point I've been making quite a lot over the past few months, we've got a gigantic structural deficit headed down the pike.  We should do as much as possible to keep the damn thing from getting any bigger.  Raising a new tax to cover a new outlay of revenue is sound fiscal policy, especially when you're talking about spending another $30 billion per annum.

However, to reiterate a point Paul Krugman has been making quite a lot over the last few months, right now, we want to do everything possible to stimulate the economy.  Contractionary fiscal policy is not a sound plan when unemployment is up over 10%, and looks set to grow even further.  So if you're going to do a war surtax, you want to delay it a little.  Make it take effect in 2011, and sunset a year after the last troops are withdrawn.  (Or fall below some reference level; we don't want to keep a "war tax" because we've got 20 military advisers still in country.)

I'm not quite sure what the objection is.  It's one thing to finance World War II on massive deficit spending; the volume of expenditures was such that it couldn't really have been financed any other way.  But while $30 billion is a large enough sum that we should try to keep from adding it to our deficit, it is not such a large sum that we can't finance it out of current cash flow.  I can see arguing with the structure of the tax--indeed, I might be prepared to do so.  Or worrying that it wouldn't sunset, since we only recently repealed a telephone tax enacted to finance the Spanish American War.  But the basic concept of raising the taxes necessary to cover extra spending seems like something we should all be able to agree on.


Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Should Google's Search Results Be Protected by the First Amendment? Should Google's Search Results Be Protected by Free Speech?
The Proposed Auction of Ronald Reagan's Blood Isn't Surprising The Proposed Auction of Ronald Reagan's Blood Isn't Surprising
Infographic: A Fast Food Burger Is 3 Times Larger Now Than in The 1950s A Fast Food Burger Is 3 Times Larger Now Than in The 1950s
For the 1st Time Ever, a Majority of the Unemployed Have Attended College The New Unemployed
Mitt Romney, One Night Stands, and the Economics of Relationships The Economics of Relationships

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

One Year Since the Joplin Tornado

May 23, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why You Can’t Get a Taxi

And how an upstart company may change that

Europe’s Real Crisis

The Continent’s problems are as much demographic as financial. They won’t go away soon.

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…