Skip Navigation
Daniel Indiviglio

Daniel Indiviglio - Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

1% Success Rate For Obama Administration Mortgage Modification Program

By Daniel Indiviglio
Dec 11 2009, 11:15 AM ET Comment

Some government programs turn out to be moderately successful. Others turn out to be a disappointment. A few turn out to be disastrous failures. Then there's the Obama administration's mortgage modification program, which hasn't done well enough to qualify for even the worst of those categories. Data (.pdf) released yesterday shows that it's had an incredibly pathetic 1% success rate thus far.

Here's the chart that tells the story:

Nov 2009 mort mods treas rpt.PNG

So out of over 3 million requests sent to borrowers, only 31,382 modifications have been made permanent. That's a failure of epic proportions. Imagine if you got a 1% score on a test when you were in school. How embarrassing. No wonder the link to this report is "accidentally" broken on the financial stability website. (I found it by guessing what they'd correctly name the file and typing it into the browser.)

Active trial modifications are faring a little better at 22%. Of course, that's still an F--- grade. And remember: these numbers don't include re-defaults, which are almost certain to occur, even after some of these trials go permanent.

Another trend that the Obama administration must find troubling is the steady decline in modifications being offered to troubled homeowners. For the past few months, the number has been declining:

Nov 2009 mort mods treas rpt - 2.PNG

I reported yesterday that foreclosures declined by 8% in November, so it might make sense that trials offered have declined. By they've declined by a whopping 30% from October to November.

The blame for why this program has gone so badly has been spread across multiple parties. Maybe banks and servicers are purposely taking measures to prevent modifications from succeeding. Maybe the borrowers just can't afford modifications, so they don't stick. Or maybe the government's requirements were too strict to modify most underwater mortgages. It's hard to believe that any one factor could result in such a serious failure, so it's probably a combination of factors.

Interestingly, the House today is considering a provision to allow bankruptcy judges to "cram down" mortgage balances to help underwater homeowners. They passed a similar provision a while back, but it died in the Senate. This time it would be attached as an amendment to the large financial regulation bill, also being considered today.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Buying a Piece of America: Why Chinese Shoppers Love U.S. Brands Why Chinese Shoppers Love American Brands
How the Global Middle Class Can Save the American Middle Class How the Global Middle Class Can Save America's Middle Class
'Hysteria' Turns the Vibrator Into Inspirational Cinema A Film That Makes the Vibrator Inspirational
'Men in Black 3': A Could-See 'Men in Black 3': A Could-See
How Google Can Beat Facebook Without Google Plus How Google Can Win the Social Media War

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)