The VAT's Public Perception

As Derek noted earlier, there's been a lot of talk lately in the wonkosphere about the possibility of a value-added tax (VAT). Liberals love the idea, because it would produce a lot more tax revenue. Conservatives like the idea, because they think it's fairer than a more progressive income tax. But not everybody likes the idea. In fact, everybody overwhelmingly hates it.

I stumbled over a poll that Rasmussen conducted last week that sought to determine American support of a national sales tax, after Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) voiced her support. Although a VAT isn't precisely the same as a national sales tax, the general idea is similar enough to make the poll's results interesting. Here's how it broke down:

Rasmussen National Sales Tax3.PNG

Interestingly, the poll separately found that 60% of Americans believed that tax increases hurt the economy. So since 7% more than that opposes the VAT, Americans likely believe a VAT would hurt the economy even more than other kinds of taxes.

I suspect the numbers would get better if those polled were given an option where a VAT would replace other existing taxes. I'll test that theory below (so please vote!). For example, I'm sure those with high incomes would prefer a VAT to a progressive income tax. Smokers might prefer a VAT to a tobacco tax. Truckers might like it more than a tax on gasoline.

It helped if Americans thought the money would be used for health care or deficit reduction:

Thirty-eight percent (38%) support a national sales tax to help pay for health care for all Americans. But most voters (55%) are still opposed. In May, 40% favored and 49% opposed a national sales tax if the revenue was used to help provide universal health care.


If the money raised from the tax is used to reduce the federal deficit, 39% are in favor, with 48% opposed. Thirteen percent (13%) are not sure.

Those numbers are better, but still pretty bad. And of course, public opinion is all that really matters in politics. If a majority of voters aren't on board with an idea, then a majority of politicians probably won't be either. So unless public perception of a national sales tax changes substantially, then I doubt we'll see a VAT in the U.S.

But in the meantime, let us know what you think by voting below on whether you'd support a VAT or National Sales Tax if it replaced some existing taxes:

Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we still save the night sky?

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we still save the night sky?

Video

The Faces of #BlackLivesMatter

Scenes from a recent protest in New York City

Video

Desegregated, Yet Unequal

A short documentary about the legacy of Boston busing

Video

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life

The Supreme Court justice talks gender equality and marriage.

Video

Social Media: The Video Game

What if the validation of your peers could "level up" your life?

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Business

Just In