Skip Navigation
Daniel Indiviglio

Daniel Indiviglio - Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

Regulating Your In-Flight Water

By Daniel Indiviglio
Oct 6 2009, 5:05 PM ET Comment

With all the talk of financial regulation recently, it's nice to see things brought back to basics a little with some news about where regulation began: food. Earlier, Megan posted about regulating ground beef. Today there is additional news that airlines will now have to follow new water rules to ensure it's clean for drinking.

As with all regulation, you might wonder: what is the cost? Reuters reports:

The change, five years in the making and affecting 63 airlines and 7,300 planes, will replace interim systems for monitoring bacteria and other pathogens that could sicken passengers.


The EPA expects the annual cost to the industry to be about $7 million. Airlines have 18 months to develop maintenance plans that comply with the standards.


That breaks down to roughly $1000 per plane, according to the numbers it provides. That's not much when divided among the thousands of passengers most planes carry in one year. So I wouldn't expect to see your ticket prices increase too substantially with this regulation.

Yet, most airlines are in no shape to take on any additional costs. I'm sure they're not crazy about the change. This raises a few interesting questions:

First, what happens if a plane offers only bottled water instead? Could it then forgo the systems that this regulation requires it puts in place? I talked to a spokesperson at the EPA who informed me that airlines would still have to comply with these guidelines, even if serving bottled water.

The follow-up question, then, is whether that might cause airlines to move away from bottled water. Over the past few years, I've noticed more airlines using bottles instead of their tap. If they're already required to make that expenditure, ensuring that they have clean water -- at least by Uncle Sam's standards -- might they want to capitalize on that forced cost? It seems that this would be a rather obvious cost savings measure.

Finally, what took the EPA so long? Since 9/11 you haven't been allowed to bring bottles of water through security. That means you had to either pay exorbitant bottled water prices in the terminal or apparently drink potentially tainted, unregulated water. As cynical as I am about regulation, if they aren't going to let people bring their own water on a plane, then I have trouble with their allowing airlines to serve passengers dirty water instead.
Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Adulthood, Delayed: What Has the Recession Done to Millennials? Adulthood, Delayed: The Recession and Millennials
The Oldest Cat Video of All Time? The Oldest Cat Video of All Time?
What Is Jeremy Lin Worth? What Is Jeremy Lin Worth?
An Aging African Leader Whose Time Has Ended Senegal's Persistant President
Tiger Woods Should See a Psychiatrist Tiger Should See a Psychiatrist

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
Submit Your Photos of America at Work AP Submit Your Photos of America at Work
Send us your images of friends, family, and neighbors on the job. We'll publish the best. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)