New York City Still Financial Capital


Bloomberg reports on some poll results I find a little surprising: global financial professionals still pick New York City as the best place for financial services in the near-term. I have hypothesized that the City would fall from its pedestal because Manhattan bankers would pay the price for violating the trust of foreign investors who lost millions on U.S. investments. Moreover, I believed that the massive regulatory constraints that Washington was likely to place on Wall Street could cause it to lose its competitive edge. This poll says otherwise.

Here's the breakdown of the Bloomberg poll:

bloomberg poll 2009-10.PNG

Bloomberg surveyed 1,452 customers earlier this month. Respondents included investors, traders and analysts from six continents who subscribe to their Bloomberg terminal.

So what about my worries? In the article accompanying this poll, one respondent said the following about the regulatory environment in the U.S. vs. Europe:

"Americans will fight harder against politicians than those in Europe and stand a better chance of a compromise on regulation, taxes and populism," says poll respondent Richard Nolan, a strategist at the London brokerage firm Newedge Group. "So New York and London will suffer but I believe that London will suffer more."

And that's exactly what we're seeing. No regulatory measures have passed a year later after the climax of the crisis. What's more, the proposals offered aren't nearly as severe as some of the more drastic suggestions shouted during the height of the crisis.

So what of the U.S. "financial innovation" often blamed for bringing the global market to its knees? Another respondent says:

"Despite the carnage of 2008, I still expect the 'new new' thing in financial services to be developed and nurtured here, and ultimately exported to the world," says poll respondent Peter Rup, who manages more than $300 million at Artemis Wealth Advisors LLC and Orion Capital Management LLC in New York.

Of course, he's an American, but the point is well taken. The U.S. does still have some pretty impressive financial minds, so it may continue to lead financial innovation, for better or for worse.

Yet, I still think my broader thesis could be right. While New York may remain the most important financial center, it might still be a lot less important than it once was. I just don't believe as many foreign investors are going to be comfortable working with Americans if they got burned by U.S. products or services. The problem is that there aren't any better financial capitals to turn to. So outside of the U.S., more people might just choose to leave their money in domestic hands, rather than tangle with those crazy Americans on Wall Street.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Why Are Americans So Bad at Saving Money?

The US is particularly miserable at putting aside money for the future. Should we blame our paychecks or our psychology?

Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus


The Death of Film

You'll never hear the whirring sound of a projector again.


How to Hunt With Poison Darts

A Borneo hunter explains one of his tribe's oldest customs: the art of the blowpipe


A Delightful, Pixar-Inspired Cartoon

An action figure and his reluctant sidekick trek across a kitchen in search of treasure.


I Am an Undocumented Immigrant

"I look like a typical young American."


Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion



More in Business

Just In