Skip Navigation
Daniel Indiviglio

Daniel Indiviglio - Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit Is Fraudster's Delight

By Daniel Indiviglio
Oct 22 2009, 1:10 PM ET Comment

The program that extends a tax credit to first-time home buyers might be propping up more than the housing market. According to a report just released by the Treasury, scammers are benefitting too. The report cites widespread fraud in the program meant to help the ailing housing market to heal more quickly by creating more buyer demand. This is particularly notable right now, since Congress must decide whether to extend the program past November. This report could hurt its chances.

Here's some detail via the New York Times:

A previously undisclosed report from the Treasury Department's inspector general said that as of Sept. 30, the Internal Revenue Service had identified 167 suspected criminal schemes and opened nearly 107,000 examinations of potential civil violations. In late July, the I.R.S. announced its first successful prosecution.


I don't find this terribly surprising. But 107,000 is a pretty big number. That's nearly 8% of the 1.4 million homes sales have claimed the credit. Of course, not all of those investigations will turn up fraud. I doubt that most will. But still, even a few percent is a pretty huge portion.

Should this report of fraud cause Washington to let the credit expire? I think it depends on how costly that fraud turns out to be. If this fraud is relatively easy and inexpensive to identify and eliminate, then I wouldn't be too concerned. If deep investigation is necessary, making the program far more costly because of the fraud, then that is a problem.

Ultimately though, you have to ask the question of whether or not the benefit exceeds the cost of the program -- and that includes the expense of fraud that comes along with it. I'd suspect that virtually every government handout results in some scamming. If fraud is significantly more prevalent or expensive than usual in this program, then that could prove its was constructed poorly, and perhaps a better design should be sought. But if encouraging first-time home buyers to take the plunge in a bad real estate market remains an important economic policy action, then the entire strategy shouldn't be shelved.
Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Mutts Mobilize in Midtown Against Mitt Mutts Against Mitt
The 10 Most Expensive Cities in the World (and How They Got That Way) The World's Most Expensive Cities (and How They Got That Way)
Study of the Day: How We Really Read Restaurant Menus How We Read Restaurant Menus
Politics Q&A: Senator Rand Paul Rand Paul: 'You Don't Go Into Politics Unless You Want to Win'
Adulthood, Delayed: What Has the Recession Done to Millennials? Adulthood, Delayed: The Recession and Millennials

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Next Global Economies Reuters The Next Global Economies
Lessons from the BRICs — and a look at which developing countries are on the rise. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)