Rutgers: Full Employment Won't Return Until 2017

Rutgers economists have a new report (opens .pdf) out today with some pretty dire predictions about the U.S. labor market. They explain that since the beginning of the recession, the U.S. has lost 8.6 million jobs through August and will likely end up shedding at least 9.4 million. They then estimate that it will take a very, very long time to get back to our December 2007 unemployment level of 4.9%. Here's the key summarizing point:

Erasing this deficit will require substantial and sustained employment growth. Even if the nation could add 2.15 million private-sector jobs per year starting in January 2010, it would need to maintain this pace for more than 7 straight years (7.63 years), or until August 2017, to eliminate the jobs deficit! This is approximately 50 percent greater than the length of the average post-World War II expansion (58 months).

The report goes through all of its assumptions and calculations in detail, so I won't bother regurgitating that here. If you want to see a nice breakdown summarizing their calculations and assumptions, check out page 10 of the report (opens .pdf).

But it also does a lot of comparisons between this and other recessions. Here's one chart, showing the job losses recessions were responsible for since 1980:

rutgers chart 1.PNG

And here's another more detailed chart comparing the job losses from the 2001 recession and the current recession:

rutgers chart 2.PNG

I thought it might be fun depressing to map out their estimated recovery, since the report doesn't. Using their assumptions, including a linear increase in employment beginning in January 2010 through August 2017 to get us back to our December 2007 level, here's what the graph would look like (using Bureau of Labor Statistics data for the historical rates):

rutgers chart 3.PNG

And this is the same data since 1980:

rutgers chart 4.PNG

That is a very, very long time to take employment to recover. And it also assumes we don't have a recession for the next 8+ years, which is probably fantasy. So if anything it might be optimistic.

The moral of the story: if you have a job, hold onto it for dear life.

Presented by

Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

How to Build a Tornado

A Canadian inventor believes his tornado machine could solve the world's energy crisis. The only problem? He has to prove it works.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Build a Tornado

A Canadian inventor believes his tornado machine could solve the world's energy crisis.

Video

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

Video

The Faces of #BlackLivesMatter

Scenes from a recent protest in New York City

Video

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life

The Supreme Court justice talks gender equality and marriage.

Video

The Pentagon's $1.5 Trillion Mistake

The F-35 fighter jet was supposed to do everything. Instead, it can barely do anything.

More in Business

Just In