Is Glenn Beck's Ad Revenue Imploding?

More

Glenn Beck has been losing advertisers for a few months now, but Fox News continues to claim that they're not losing revenue, they're just moving around advertisers to keep the sensitive companies away from Beck's unique blend of proto-patriotic neo-apocalpytic humor. But Gawker gets their hands on some information that suggests Beck's advertising revenue has cratered:


Here's the graph:
 




















And's Gawker's description of the source:

We've been told the source and shown the raw data on the condition that we don't reveal where it came from: a well-known firm that tracks advertising revenue and sells its proprietary data. The firm monitors advertising on shows and uses rate-cards, ratings information, and its own industry contacts to estimate how much advertisers paid for each spot. While the firm sometimes performs analysis for the media, it generally doesn't like its proprietary information becoming public, which is why Color of Change won't let anyone say where it came from. While the numbers are only estimates and can't really account for the sorts of deals networks make with advertisers all the time, the firm is respected and regularly used as a best-guess estimate of ad revenue.

Gawker says the chart "puts to lie" the claim that Fox News isn't losing money by keeping Glenn Beck on the air. I don't know. Shadowy guesstimation that one show is losing ad revenue doesn't make it a scientific fact that Fox News is losing ad revenue overall. Fox News has called the graph "wildly inaccurate on all fronts." A battle for truth between an anonymous corporate tipster and a Fox News flack is one that I am unqualified and unwilling to referee.

In any case, I continue to find the plight of Glenn Beck bizarrely fascinating. Here's a guy who runs the third-most popular cable news program on television -- with an audience bigger than Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow combined -- at 5 o'clock. And yet the content of his hugely popular show is so controversial to a wider audience that a handful of companies would rather publicize their refusal to advertise on the program, or its 2.4 million viewers. This is really just an incredibly bizarre situation Fox News has on its hands, even as the company takes in its biggest pile of ad money in history.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the entertainment business.

Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

What's the Number One Thing We Could Do to Improve City Life?

A group of journalists, professors, and non-profit leaders predict the future of livable, walkable cities


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Adventures in Legal Weed

Colorado is now well into its first year as the first state to legalize recreational marijuana. How's it going? James Hamblin visits Aspen.

Video

What Makes a Story Great?

The storytellers behind House of CardsandThis American Life reflect on the creative process.

Video

Tracing Sriracha's Origin to Thailand

Ever wonder how the wildly popular hot sauce got its name? It all started in Si Racha.

Video

Where Confiscated Wildlife Ends Up

A government facility outside of Denver houses more than a million products of the illegal wildlife trade, from tigers and bears to bald eagles.

Video

Is Wine Healthy?

James Hamblin prepares to impress his date with knowledge about the health benefits of wine.

Video

The World's Largest Balloon Festival

Nine days, more than 700 balloons, and a whole lot of hot air

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In