Will Transaction Taxes Reduce Leverage?

The chairman of Britain's FSA wants to radically shrink the financial sector, and says he's willing to do so by any means necessary, up to and including a "Tobin tax".  Kevin Drum likes the idea:

As for the transaction tax, I don't know how practical that is.  But if it can be made to work, it's a good idea.  Not only would it raise some money, but it would put a crimp in some of the most highly leveraged investment schemes, which fundamentally depend on tiny returns multiplied by billions of dollars.  A transaction tax would make a lot of them unprofitable.  So it's a twofer.

I'm not precisely clear on what Lord Turner means by a Tobin Tax, which is technically a tax on currency transactions.  Once you get beyond there, it's sort of vague as to how and where you would apply such a tax.

But any sort of feasible tax is not going to reduce highly leveraged investment schemes.  I mean, if you're taxing debt issuance, it will increase your interest rate or the points on the loan, which might put some pressure on leverage.  But I don't think by that much.  You're talking about forcing someone to reduce their leverage from 20-to-1 to 19.8-to-1.

What a transaction tax makes less profitable is a portfolio strategy that relies on lots of quick trades.  I suppose there's a valid question about how much social value those folks provide, though you have to admit that they do at least increase the speed of the price information available in the markets, and to some extent their liquidity, which most people regard as a good thing.  But that's not going to stop anyone from borrowing vast sums and plowing them into highly illiquid assets like complex mortgage-backed securities.  That being approximately what everyone is complaining about in the current crisis.

What such a tax would also do is make a lot of people freak out.  If you tax debt transactions, you've suddenly got more points on your mortgage, your money market account stops paying much of anything, your credit card comes with a hefty annual fee, and businesses small and large have more trouble borrowing short money to cover temporary cash flow issues.  If you don't tax debt transactions, the largest effect of the tax will be to punish actively traded investment funds.  The academic literature indicates that this is stupid behavior that already is punished by sub-par returns, but it's not a social threat that looms large.

Lord Turner undoubtedly knows a lot more about finance than I do, so it is possible, even probable, that I am missing something.  But until I hear some more convincing explanation, I am officially skeptical.  If his quite sensible preferred strategy of higher capital requirements doesn't reduce the amount of unhealthy leverage in the system, I fail to see what a tax will add except, well, a tax.

Presented by

Megan McArdle is a columnist at Bloomberg View and a former senior editor at The Atlantic. Her new book is The Up Side of Down.

Saving the Bees

Honeybees contribute more than $15 billion to the U.S. economy. A short documentary considers how desperate beekeepers are trying to keep their hives alive.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How to Cook Spaghetti Squash (and Why)

Cooking for yourself is one of the surest ways to eat well.

Video

Before Tinder, a Tree

Looking for your soulmate? Write a letter to the "Bridegroom's Oak" in Germany.

Video

The Health Benefits of Going Outside

People spend too much time indoors. One solution: ecotherapy.

Video

Where High Tech Meets the 1950s

Why did Green Bank, West Virginia, ban wireless signals? For science.

Video

Yes, Quidditch Is Real

How J.K. Rowling's magical sport spread from Hogwarts to college campuses

Video

Would You Live in a Treehouse?

A treehouse can be an ideal office space, vacation rental, and way of reconnecting with your youth.

More in Business

Just In