Skip Navigation
Daniel Indiviglio

Daniel Indiviglio - Daniel Indiviglio was an associate editor at The Atlantic from 2009 through 2011. He is now the Washington, D.C.-based columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. He is also a 2011 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow through the Phillips Foundation. More

Indiviglio has also written for Forbes. Prior to becoming a journalist, he spent several years working as an investment banker and a consultant.

Why We Should Rejoice As Pensions Shun Stocks

By Daniel Indiviglio
Aug 17 2009, 2:10 PM ET Comment

Bloomberg has an article out noting that pension funds are slowly backing away from the stock market. Given last year's stock market collapse, these funds saw huge losses from seemingly safe bets, like highly valued bank stocks. As a result, no one should be too surprised that they still feel the sting and are a little wary about diving back into the stock market. The Wall Street might lament this trend, but I think it's a good thing.

Here's some detail from Bloomberg:

Funds overseeing money for California teachers and public workers, Dutch government retirees and South Korean private- sector employees reduced their target weightings for equities this year, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The rest of the 10 largest kept them the same. U.K. pensions have cut stock allocations to the lowest since 1974, according to Citigroup Inc. Managers handling Oxford and Cambridge University professors' assets have been selling shares as the MSCI World Index posted a five-month, 51 percent rally.


First off, the trend is rational. When the stock market does too well for too long, investors are lulled into a false sense of security. 2008 caused them to snap out of it. Pension funds need to be extremely safe, stable investments. While some stocks may fit this mold, most do not.

Second, this better fits their investment objectives. The purpose of a pension is to one day pay out a fixed income to its shareholders. What could fit that goal more appropriately than investing in fixed income securities? That's not to say that stocks have no place in pension funds. After all, some stocks pay relatively predictable dividends, which can act a little bit like fixed income. But those are probably one of the few kinds of stocks that pension funds should find acceptable, given their risk-tolerance level.

You could argue, of course, that bonds also have some risk. That's true, but in theory those income streams should still generally be more predictable than stock market returns. Investors in corporate debt have a much better chance of getting back their original investment if a company fails than equity holders. As for mortgage-backed securities, I would hope that this market, in particular, has learned its lesson and that in the future those bonds will be much safer. Of course, there's also Treasury and municipal bonds, the safest of all investments, and a great fit for a pension.
Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The Weakening of Nations: How Tax Work-Arounds Undermine Our Society Those Cayman Islands Accounts Will Undermine Our Society
What Do Republican Voters See in Rick Santorum? What Do Republican Voters See in Rick Santorum?
Death by Flavored Vodka Death by Flavored Vodka
A Brief History of the to-do List and the Psychology of Its Success A Brief History of the To-Do List and the Psychology of Its Success
Whitney Houston Has Died Whitney Houston's Greatest Hits

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
Submit Your Photos of America at Work AP Submit Your Photos of America at Work
Send us your images of friends, family, and neighbors on the job. We'll publish the best. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

The Civil War, Part 3: The Stereographs

Feb 10, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)