Nostalgia for Healthcare Bipartisanship

More

Uwe E. Reinhardt points out that in 2003, no one subjected prescription drug coverage to the requirement of a balanced budget when they passed the Medicare Modernization Act. He notes that between 2010 and 2019, Medicare spending on prescription drugs is projected at $1 trillion, "Over 90 percent of that total represents the effect of the M.M.A." He continues:


And how was this vast new entitlement for the elderly financed?

Were taxes raised specifically to finance the bill? They were not. Was federal spending elsewhere cut specifically to finance the bill? It was not.

One could argue that the M.M.A was passed in 2003 because of the spirit of bipartisanship that then prevailed, particularly between President Bush and the late Senator Edward Kennedy. One could also argue that nostalgia for such bipartisanship is somewhat misplaced.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Arnold Kling

Arnold Kling earned his Ph.D in economics at MIT. He was an economist on the staff of the Federal Reserve Board. From 1986-1994 he worked at Freddie Mac. He started Homefair.com in 1994 and sold it in 1999. His fourth book, From Poverty to Prosperity, co-authored with Nick Schulz, is due out in April of 2009. He blogs regularly at Econlog.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Sad Desk Lunch: Is This How You Want to Die?

How to avoid working through lunch, and diseases related to social isolation.


Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

Where Time Comes From

The clocks that coordinate your cellphone, GPS, and more

Video

Computer Vision Syndrome and You

Save your eyes. Take breaks.

Video

What Happens in 60 Seconds

Quantifying human activity around the world

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In