Skip Navigation
Derek Thompson

Derek Thompson - Derek Thompson is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he oversees business coverage for the website.
More

He is a visiting research fellow at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget at the New America Foundation. Derek has also written for Slate, BusinessWeek, and the Daily Beast. He has appeared as a guest on radio and television networks, including NPR, the BBC, CNBC, and MSNBC.

Alaska Getting Poorer, Faster

By Derek Thompson
Jun 18 2009, 12:30 PM ET Comment

The United States has lost $63 billion of personal income in the last quarter, and about the fifth of the loss comes from California. But when you line up the states back to back in order of percent change in income, America's late acquisitions are the bookends: Hawaii is getting richer, faster, while Alaska's income plummet is more than six-times worse than the national average.



A quick caveat for Alaska's figures is pointed out in the introduction. The Alaska Parliament Permanent Fund offered a 2008 special* $2000 payment to each resident (socialism?), so the percent drop in income is inflated. But still, Alaska did suffer the worst year-over-year GDP drop of any state in the union, so it's no surprise that its personal income should suffer similarly.

Here's a graph comparing all the states' income drops, by percentage.
personalincomepercent.png And because blogging is all about making loose connections (just like Obama's speeches) check out how this graph compares with the 2008 election results:

2008vote.png

Of the 20 states with positive quarter-over-quarter personal income gains, a majority (12) went for McCain! This is not as stunning an observation as I thought it would be when I uploaded the electoral map, but oh well. In the data, one thing that strikes me about the Southeast is that while farming incomes nationally fell at a near-double-digit level, they actually increased in the Southeast by nearly 10 percent.

*Update: Astute Atlantic fellow Jeannette Lee points out that the Alaska Permanent Fund is, well, more permanent than I suggested, and not very parliamentary at all. It's basically a way to funnel oil (and other minerals') revenue to current and future Alaskans. She explains: "The 2008 payout of $2,000 wasn't a special one-shot deal. It's paid out annually, just in varying amounts depending on the five-year average of oil royalty investments. The special payout in 2008 that you may have been thinking of was a $1,200 "energy rebate," which came on top of the Permanent Fund payout, for a grand total of $3,200 and change."

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice
Watch and Buy: Kickstarter Is the Hipster Home Shopping Network Kickstarter Is the Hipster Home Shopping Network
The Controversial German Book Linking the Euro to Holocaust Guilt Holocaust Guilt Is to Blame for the Euro
What It Means That Computers Can Tell These Smiles Apart, But You Can't Which Smile Is Fake? (This Computer Knows)
'Men in Black 3': A Could-See 'Men in Black 3': A Could-See

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)