Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. She is currently on leave.
More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero � all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

Facing Foreclosure

By Megan McArdle
May 7 2009, 4:58 PM ET Comment

The other day, Ryan Avent had a good post on who is actually defaulting on their mortgages.  Though you commonly hear the discussion framed as a question of when interest rates reset, Ryan points out that this isn't really accurate.  The problem is not principally people who can't pay their mortgages because their interest rates have reset--people will cut back on a lot of other things to keep their house, and if you can't afford a 1% rate increase even with drastic lifestyle cuts, you probably have too much house. 




Rather, the main problem is people who have an income shock.  Normally, if you lose your job, and you can't afford your house, you're eventually forced to sell it.  But when the market drops 20%, if you're a recent homeowner, or if you did a cash-out refi, you can't sell it, because you'll end up owing money at the closing.  Obviously, if you had tens of thousands of dollars to hand over at closing, you wouldn't need to get out in the first place.

This has tricky policy implications.  The supply of credit--for which interest rates are usually a good proxy--has huge effects on home prices in this world of majority mortgage financing.  We've pushed interest rates down as far as they're going to go, but that's not going to reinflate the bubble.  So huge numbers of people who have income shocks are going to end up in foreclosure unless their bank allows a short sale.

But what's the alternative?  Huge write-downs to the mortgage principal of everyone who gets in trouble?  They'll still have to sell the house in a lousy market.  And it makes the banks more fragile, while unfairly handing a giant subsidy to those who happen to lose their jobs.

On the other hand, it does mitigate the claim that this is about irresponsible borrowing--at least in a lot of markets.  In places like California and Florida, where prices of large houses have dropped 30-50%, the most sensible downpayment policies wouldn't have kept people from going underwater.  Though to be fair, highly insensible downpayment policies helped inflate the bubble, and a lot of people with tiny downpayments are getting themselves in trouble.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The Revenge of the Rust Belt: How the Midwest Got Its Groove Back The Revenge of the Rust Belt
The New Economics of Happiness The New Economics of Happiness
Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice Fact-Checking Claims on the Wonders of Pomegranate Juice
What It Means That Computers Can Tell These Smiles Apart, But You Can't Which Smile Is Fake? (This Computer Knows)
Does the Supreme Court Believe in Double Jeopardy Protections? Does the Supreme Court Believe in Double Jeopardy Protections?

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why You Can’t Get a Taxi

And how an upstart company may change that

Europe’s Real Crisis

The Continent’s problems are as much demographic as financial. They won’t go away soon.

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…