Why Credit Default Swaps are Dangerous

More

Felix Salmon says that credit default swaps are just like bonds.  Charles Davi says they are just like futures and forwards (actually, they are most like options), which are derivatives that provide liquidity.  But CDS are different from either of these.


The difference between credit default swaps and typical financial derivatives is the long-term nature of the commitment with CDS.  On organized futures and options markets, it is essentially impossible to obtain a long-dated option.  That is, if I want to buy an option that expires three years from now, I have no real chance of doing so.  In most markets, such options are not traded at all.  Even when there are option contracts that exist for more than six months ahead, trading volumes are slim, so that it is quite difficult to take a position of any size.

Long-dated options are only sold over-the-counter, with CDS being the main example.  I believe that some currency swaps and interest-rate swaps sold over-the-counter also are long-dated.  I suspect that those contracts are dangerous as well.  If interest rates on Treasuries rise to double-digit rates in the next few years, then my guess is that some sellers of interest-rate swaps will blow up.

If you sell a long-dated option, then you need much more in terms of capital and loss reserves to cover your bet than is the case with options that expire over the next few months.  Unless, of course, you are willing to take the risk of blowing up in a few years in order to get some nice profits in the near term.  My guess is that if the writers of all forms of long-dated options were required to put up sufficient capital and loss reserves, the markets in those options would shrink considerably.

Speaking of capital, you need it in order to invest in bonds.  But when you create a synthetic position in bonds by writing credit default swaps, you can do so without putting up capital. With bonds, investors who put debt or equity in your firm have a clear picture of what their risk and return profiles look like.  With credit default swaps, you hide your leveraged bond position from regulators and investor. 

There is nothing intrinsically opaque about credit default swaps.  Regulators and accountants could require firms that are net sellers of credit default swaps to translate those positions into bond holdings and put these synthetic bonds on their balance sheets.  My guess is that had such a policy been in place in 2000, the CDS market would not have taken off. 


Jump to comments
Presented by

Arnold Kling

Arnold Kling earned his Ph.D in economics at MIT. He was an economist on the staff of the Federal Reserve Board. From 1986-1994 he worked at Freddie Mac. He started Homefair.com in 1994 and sold it in 1999. His fourth book, From Poverty to Prosperity, co-authored with Nick Schulz, is due out in April of 2009. He blogs regularly at Econlog.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity


Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

CrossFit Versus Yoga: Choose a Side

How a workout becomes a social identity

Video

Is Technology Making Us Better Storytellers?

The minds behind House of Cards and The Moth weigh in.

Video

A Short Film That Skewers Hollywood

A studio executive concocts an animated blockbuster. Who cares about the story?

Video

In Online Dating, Everyone's a Little Bit Racist

The co-founder of OKCupid shares findings from his analysis of millions of users' data.

Video

What Is a Sandwich?

We're overthinking sandwiches, so you don't have to.

Video

Let's Talk About Not Smoking

Why does smoking maintain its allure? James Hamblin seeks the wisdom of a cool person.

Writers

Up
Down

More in Business

Just In