Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. She is currently on leave.
More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero � all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

What do you mean by "New Deal"?

By Megan McArdle
Feb 19 2009, 3:41 PM ET Comment

One more point that's worth making about all of this:  discussing fiscal stimulus is not the same as arguing whether FDR prolonged the Great Depression, or shortened it--a very complicated discussion I'm not prepared to have right now.  When you ask whether fiscal stimulus shortened the Great Depression, you should be simply asking 


1)  Was there a fiscal stimulus
2)  Did it shorten the Great Depression?

The tenative consensus answer is that the stimulus was small compared to, say, 10 years later, and that other factors probably contributed more than the fiscal stimulus.

But "other factors" were some things that FDR did.  His bank holiday may not have been the best way to handle the crisis, but it handled the crisis, and ended the disastrous second banking panic.  The FDIC, FSLIC, and so forth were created on his watch.  Conservatives often write these bits out of the New Deal in order to argue that FDR's other actions prolonged the Great Depression, but these, too, were part of the New Deal.  I'd say NIRA indisputably prolonged it, FDIC et. al. certainly shortened it significantly, some of the stuff he did was foolish but not really relevant (gold purchases, I'm looking at you!) and other things, like fiscal stimulus, are hard to measure. On net did the New Deal prolong the Great Depression?  I view the banking reforms as dispositive, and NIRA didn't last that long, so on balance I'd say no, but that's a long and complicated dispute.

To be fair, liberals also conflate all the things that FDR did with "massive government spending programs", and it's equally wrong.  It is not arguable, in my mind, that FDR's biggest contribution to fixing the mess was fixing the banks, not building dams.  But the national narrative puts the FDIC somewhere down there with paying writers for taking oral histories of sharecroppers, and elevates the massive public works projects to center stage.

It's also important to point out--which I've done, like, eighty times--that this is not an argument over works projects.  It's a technical question:  how much does fiscal stimulus do to counteract a really nasty depression?  This matters in part because we're not going to build the Hoover Dam again, and we don't need to--we have social insurance to deal with unemployment in a way that we didn't then, and so we don't need to create make work in order to keep people from starving.


Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Obama Needs to Articulate a Second-Term Agenda What Would Obama Do With Four More Years?
Meet the 'Fly Boys' of Memphis, the Future of American Education Meet the 'Fly Boys' of Memphis, the Future of Education
The Controversial German Book Linking the Euro to Holocaust Guilt Holocaust Guilt Is to Blame for the Euro
The '7 Dirty Words' Turn 40, but They're Still Dirty The '7 Dirty Words' Turn 40
The New Welfare State: Faster, Cheaper ... and Out of Control? The New Welfare State: Faster, Cheaper ... and Out of Control?

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Where in the World? Part 3: A Google Earth Puzzle

May 25, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why You Can’t Get a Taxi

And how an upstart company may change that

Europe’s Real Crisis

The Continent’s problems are as much demographic as financial. They won’t go away soon.

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…