More love for Big Labor

Obama signs an executive order encouraging stimulus projects costing more than $25 million to use union-only project labor agreements.  This means that any contractor or subcontractor working on a large project will have to submit a bids with collective bargaining agreements spanning one or more unions for the duration of the project.  In theory, you could bid a job with non-union labor, but let a union run the bargaining.  In practice, projects with PLAs almost always go to union shops.

What does this mean for the stimulus?  Union labor is more expensive.  Every project that uses a PLA will cost more, and many of those jobs will use as much capital equipment as possible to minimize the demand for labor.  That means that we will get a lot less employment for every dollar of stimulus spent than we would without the PLA.

Obama is offering these "cheap" concessions to the unions because it's lookng less likely that the Democrats will be able to get EFCA through.  But these things aren't free.  They're just less transparent.

Presented by

Megan McArdle is a columnist at Bloomberg View and a former senior editor at The Atlantic. Her new book is The Up Side of Down.

Why Principals Matter

Nadia Lopez didn't think anybody cared about her middle school. Then Humans of New York told her story to the Internet—and everything changed.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A History of Contraception

In the 16th century, men used linen condoms laced shut with ribbons.

Video

'A Music That Has No End'

In Spain, a flamenco guitarist hustles to make a modest living.

Video

What Fifty Shades Left Out

A straightforward guide to BDSM

More in Business

Just In