Memo from the department of dangerous predictions

Fortune has an article up saying that "economists and executives believe that this time tech won't lead the country out of its slump", the way Fortune says it did in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. Why not?  Because:


...they don't see a single big idea - no semiconductors or PCs - to prime the pump. Funding for even the most promising technologies has dried up. And the country's rate of spending on new gadgets is slowing.

 

Well, let's put aside the point that apparently they think tech = IT, and are ignoring potential biology-based, rather than physics-based, tech, when biology is likely to be the more fundamental economic driver in this century.  But look at their view of new digital technologies on the horizon:


In 2009, after almost 30 years of continuous growth, tech spending as a percentage of GDP is expected to fall. The next new things - software delivered as a service over the Internet, software for mobile devices - are promising, but they are not necessarily the kinds of businesses that produce thousands of net new jobs or generate billions in new revenue overnight.

 

Execpt that there are already billion-dollar Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) companies with thousdands of employees.  Ignore the point that Google is software delivered as a service, and consider just one new SaaS company, salaesforce.com, that already has a billion dollars of revenue and employs thousands of people.  I don't know for a fact what, if any, technologies will have similar effects to that of the PC in 80s or the Internet in the 90s, but I do know that lots of experts dismissed the size of the market opportunity for both.

 

Oh, and total venture funding in the US in 2008 was about $28 billion, or just about exactly twice the roughly $14 billion in 1998, which in turn was more than a 75% increase versus prior years.

Presented by

Jim Manzi

Jim Manzi is Founder and Chairman of Applied Predictive Technologies (APT), an applied artificial intelligence software company. He is In also a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a Contributing Editor of National Review, where he writes frequently for both the print and online editions on topics related to science, technology, business and economics.

How a Psychedelic Masterpiece Is Made

A short documentary about Bruce Riley, an artist who paints abstract wonders with poured resin

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

How a Psychedelic Masterpiece Is Made

A short documentary about Bruce Riley, an artist who paints abstract wonders with poured resin

Videos

Why Is Google Making Skin?

Hidden away on Google’s campus, doctors are changing the way people think about health.

Video

How to Build a Tornado

A Canadian inventor believes his tornado machine could solve the world's energy crisis.

Video

A New York City Minute, Frozen in Time

This short film takes you on a whirling tour of the Big Apple

Video

What Happened to the Milky Way?

Light pollution has taken away our ability to see the stars. Can we save the night sky?

More in Business

Just In