Economists: After TARP And Stimulus, $600B More In Play


As the worldwide recession worsens, U.S. taxpayers face increasingly expensive options to boost the economy that could require hundreds of billions of additional dollars, a panel of economists told the Senate Budget Committee today. Noting the $350 billion spent by the government to shore up faltering banks and another $350 billion waiting to be allocated -- as well as the $800 billion-plus economic stimulus package -- the economists warned that as much as $600 billion more will be required from lawmakers to re-capitalize weakening banks, remove toxic assets from their balance sheets and address the foreclosure crisis. On top of that, the Federal Reserve might have to match that with another $600 billion to cover just the cost of bad assets on banks' balance sheets. "Until we stabilize the housing market, it'll be tough to do anything about the [sinking] economy," said Tim Adams, managing director of The Lindsey Group and a former Treasury undersecretary.

While the trio of economists -- who included Adams, Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Simon Johnson and Brad Setser of the Council on Foreign Relations -- differed on how the stimulus package should have been structured, they agreed the global crisis must be swiftly and effectively addressed by home governments or the world economy could crash. A "lost decade" is quite possible, said Simon, who worked for the IMF. Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad agreed, warning the economic distress could lead to a 60-year period of slow growth and recovery. Setser and Johnson suggested most of the additional money for saving banks and easing the housing crisis should come from the Treasury Department rather than from the Fed, since an influx of newly printed money could accelerate inflation. Of the remaining $350 billion in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the economists said at least $100 billion should be spent on foreclosure relief, with the rest going to relieve banks of the bad mortgage loans on their books. That suggestion was welcomed by Budget ranking member Judd Gregg, who repeated his call for the Senate to refashion the stimulus by shifting money from long-term economic development toward the more immediate housing crisis. The Obama team has promised that $50 billion to $100 billion of the remaining TARP funds will be dedicated to anti-foreclosure efforts.

Jump to comments
Presented by

Cyra Master

Cyra Master is a W.E.B. Du Bois fellow at the Atlantic. Previously, she was an editor at the nonprofit Center for Law and Social Policy and was a reporter for the New Hampshire Eagle Tribune. She is a graduate of Emerson College.
Get Today's Top Stories in Your Inbox (preview)

Why Did I Study Physics?

In this hand-drawn animation, a college graduate explains why she chose her major—and what it taught her about herself.

Elsewhere on the web

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus


Why Did I Study Physics?

Using hand-drawn cartoons to explain an academic passion


What If Emoji Lived Among Us?

A whimsical ad imagines what life would be like if emoji were real.


Living Alone on a Sailboat

"If you think I'm a dirtbag, then you don't understand the lifestyle."


How Is Social Media Changing Journalism?

How new platforms are transforming radio, TV, print, and digital


The Place Where Silent Movies Sing

How an antique, wind-powered pipe organ brings films to life


The Future of Iced Coffee

Are artisan businesses like Blue Bottle doomed to fail when they go mainstream?



More in Business

Just In