Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero … all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

It's been a long, long time

By Megan McArdle
Sep 12 2008, 12:22 PM ET Comment

I remember exactly the moment when I realized that the stock market was in a bubble.  It was when I overheard one of the cable guys in my firm trying to persuade another installer that he should buy Cisco on a dip.  "In the long run," he told his friend, "it always goes up."

Being something of a fan of John Kenneth Galbraith's work on financial panics, I knew that the long run could be very long indeed--the Dow was basically flat between the late 1960s and the early 1980s, which given the era's high inflation means investors actually lost money.

Well, it just occurred to me that it's been roughly ten years since I heard him make that claim.  And at the moment, the Dow is well below its January 2000 peak of 11,722.  It has gone up and down since then, but overall, we're right back where we started eight years ago. The S&P, too, is below its 2000 peak.  And the NASDAQ never even came close to regaining its former value.

If I were a certain kind of partisan, this would be a good time to blame the stock market on Bush, or the bubble on Clinton, both of which plaints have equal validity.  Which is to say, none. 

I think its more interesting to think about what this says about our financial markets.  In a world of perfect information, stock prices would never change; we'd simply discount the cash flow of a known future.  In the real world, of course, they move around all the time, often in tandem.  What information did we get--or rather, not get--over the last eight years that made the price of January 2000 such a good guess at the prices of September 2008?

One possibility is that prices are simply irrational; this is interesting, but not useful.

But perhaps the 1990s represented a real innovation:  portfolio theory, as popularized by Jeremy Siegel, made stocks genuinely less risky, and the risk premium that buyers were demanding dropped.  Though the market overshot slightly on the way down, we've basically hit a new equilibrium that has been building since the 1980s, in which prices, and P/E ratios will be permanently higher.  Something like Irving Fisher's "permanently high plateau". 

Which is not to say it won't, eventually, go up again.  It will, probably for no very good reason that anyone can pinpoint.  But that might take a very long time--it was a decade and a half the last time the market plateaued. 

This means that it's actually a very good time to be investing in your 401(k).  It won't do much for the next few years.  But when the next boom starts, all those lovely cheap assets will pop at once.


Presented by

More at The Atlantic

What Matters in President Obama's 2013 Budget What Matters in President Obama's 2013 Budget
The GOP Primary Is Badly Wounding Mitt Romney Why a Long Primary Fight Will Hurt Mitt Romney
The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet
Love Stinks: An Economic Manifesto Love Stinks: An Economic Manifesto
5 Lessons From the Rise of the BRICs 5 Lessons From the World's Great Rising Economies

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›

Just In

View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Valentine's Day 2012

Feb 14, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…

The Graduates

Busted banking careers, crashed consultants, and shrunken incomes: the author attends her 10-year…

Romney’s Business

The Republican contender touts his business experience—but does it really matter?