Skip Navigation
Megan McArdle

Megan McArdle - Megan McArdle is a senior editor for The Atlantic who writes about business and economics. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and The Economist. More

Megan was born and raised on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, and yes, she does enjoy her lattes, as well as the occasional extra-dry skim-milk cappuccino. Her checkered work history includes three start-ups, four years as a technology project manager for a boutique consulting firm, a summer as an associate at an investment bank, and a year spent as sort of an executive copy girl for one of the disaster-recovery firms at Ground Zero … all before the age of 30.

While working at Ground Zero, Megan started Live From the WTC, a blog focused on economics, business, and cooking. She may or may not have been the first major economics blogger, depending on whether we are allowed to throw outlying variables such as Brad Delong out of the set. From there it was but a few steps down the slippery slope to freelance journalism. She has worked in various capacities for The Economist, where she wrote about economics and oversaw the founding of Free Exchange, the magazine's economics blog. She has also maintained her own blog, Asymmetrical Information, which moved to The Atlantic, along with its owner, in August 2007.

Megan holds a bachelor's degree in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. After a lifetime as a New Yorker, she now resides in northwest Washington, D.C., where she is still trying to figure out what one does with an apartment larger than 400 square feet.

Is cap and trade the future?

By Megan McArdle
May 14 2008, 10:24 AM ET Comment

I agree with Matt that, as a moral matter, any cap-and-trade permits should be auctioned rather than given to current emitters; I see no prior right to pollute that must be honored in the breach. As a political matter, it's not a large amount of revenue, and the giveaway to the companies will probably go a long way to pacifying their lobby--plus you don't risk a situation like the British bandwith auction where everyone overpaid, netting fat fees for the treasury, but setting back investment for quite a while.

As a practical matter, I agree with the economist I lunched with yesterday that cap and trade is doomed as long as it includes offsets and doesn't price the carbon cost of foreign goods. Otherwise, all we do is displace consumption of fossil fuels to China--an excellent, though thoroughly inefficient, charity program, but no good for the environment. In fact, the net environmental result might well be negative. China and India use fossil fuels in a much less efficient, much more polluting way, because clean technology has a higher capital cost; a ton of coal or a barrel of oil consumed in China produces less output and more pollution than the same ton or barrel consumed here.

Meanwhile the most optimistic hope for the global offset market is that it will pay a fair number of companies to do things they would have done anyway. The darker possibility is that it will encourage developing-market companies to keep polluting facilities open longer in the hopes of selling the offset. Indeed, they might even build new ones so that westerners can pay to shut them down.

The results from Europe's scheme have so far been pretty underwhelming, though everyone keeps assuring me that they're going to take off any day now. Theoretically, cap and trade is indistinguishable from a tax provided that you know either the true externality cost of emissions, or what level of emissions is socially optimal. Since we know neither, and cap-and-trade so far looks pretty weak, I vote for a tax instead.

Of course, I'm the only one so voting, so probably we'll get cap and trade, and probably it won't do very much good. I just wanted to lay the ground for a triumphant "I told you so" later.

Not that this makes me happy; quite the reverse. I think we should do something serious about global warming. I just don't know how to overcome the political and technical problems to do so.

Presented by

More at The Atlantic

Occupy Kindergarten: The Rich-Poor Divide Starts With Education Why Rich Kids Do Better in School
Government Employs 1 in 6 U.S. Workers—Where Are They? Government Employs 1 in 6 U.S. Workers—Where Are They?
Anne Rice, 'Secret World of Arrietty': The Week Ahead in Pop Culture The Week in Pop Culture
'State of the WaPo' Watch: Two Articles Worth Reading The State of the Washington Post
Why Israel Might Believe Attacking Iran Is Worthwhile Why Israeli Leaders Might Believe Attacking Iran Is Worth the Effort

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
The Civil War National Portrait Gallery The Civil War
President Obama reflects on what Lincoln means to him and to America, in an introduction to our special issue. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

Athens in Flames

Feb 13, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

Megan McArdle
from the Magazine

Why Companies Fail

GM’s stock price has sunk by a third since its IPO. Why is corporate turnaround so difficult…

The Graduates

Busted banking careers, crashed consultants, and shrunken incomes: the author attends her 10-year…

Romney’s Business

The Republican contender touts his business experience—but does it really matter?