Telecom immunity: a festival of the bizarre

The Economist points out the absurdity of the Bush administration's position on telecom immunity with a post headlined "If we punish lawbreaking, they might not break the law again". I listened to CSPAN yesterday while driving home, and I could swear I heard a Republican legislator make an even more bizarre assertion: that congress shouldn't use its investigative powers to go after the telecoms, because otherwise they wouldn't voluntarily cooperate with the investigation. Since this seemed to be made in response to claims that they were not cooperating with the investigation, I had a hard time understanding what we, the American people, would be losing by this.

Presented by

Megan McArdle is a columnist at Bloomberg View and a former senior editor at The Atlantic. Her new book is The Up Side of Down.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register with Disqus.

Please note that The Atlantic's account system is separate from our commenting system. To log in or register with The Atlantic, use the Sign In button at the top of every page.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Video

A Stop-Motion Tour of New York City

A filmmaker animated hundreds of still photographs to create this Big Apple flip book

Video

The Absurd Psychology of Restaurant Menus

Would people eat healthier if celery was called "cool celery?"

Video

This Japanese Inn Has Been Open For 1,300 Years

It's one of the oldest family businesses in the world.

Video

What Happens Inside a Dying Mind?

Science cannot fully explain near-death experiences.

More in Business

Just In