|
|
« Previous McArdle | Next McArdle » |
|
Wilder? Wait . . .
By
Steve Teles offers another hypothesis for Clinton's victory:
I don't buy the idea that Obama lost due to the "Wilder effect" (that voters told pollsters that they'd vote for a black candidate, but secretly voted for white candidates in the secrecy of the polling booth). The main reason is that there's a plausible alternative hypothesis, which is that the large Obama lead in the polls sent independents into the Republican primary to vote for McCain. But we'll have to take a look at the data tomorrow, when we'll have fine-grained information. More soon...
Presented by





























Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus