|
|
« Previous McArdle | Next McArdle » |
|
Vegan inflation
By
An article in the WSJ today is headlined the 247-lb Vegan, about a veggie-loving tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs, is pretty good. But it does make me wonder if the headline writer, like, read the whole thing:
When I was a vegetarian, I was always annoyed by the "vegetarians" who turned out to eat fish and chicken. I wasn't annoyed because I cared about what they ate, but because their fast-and-loose standards meant that I too often showed up at a dinner party to find that the hostess thought "vegetarian" included "smoked salmon". Now apparently "vegan" is going the same way.
Mr. Gonzalez considered scrapping the diet altogether and returning to the Chiefs' standard gut-busting menu. First, though, he called Mr. Campbell, who put him in touch with Jon Hinds, himself a vegan and the former strength coach for the Los Angeles Clippers basketball team. Mr. Hinds suggested plant foods with more protein.
The Chiefs' team nutritionist, Mitzi Dulan, a former vegetarian athlete, did not believe that was enough. With the team's prospects and Mr. Gonzalez's legacy at stake, she persuaded the tight-end to incorporate small amounts of meat into his plant diet. Just no beef, pork or shellfish, he said; only a few servings of fish and chicken a week.
When I was a vegetarian, I was always annoyed by the "vegetarians" who turned out to eat fish and chicken. I wasn't annoyed because I cared about what they ate, but because their fast-and-loose standards meant that I too often showed up at a dinner party to find that the hostess thought "vegetarian" included "smoked salmon". Now apparently "vegan" is going the same way.
Presented by





























Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register. blog comments powered by Disqus