Skip Navigation
Clive Crook

Clive Crook - Clive Crook is a senior editor of The Atlantic and a columnist for Bloomberg View. He was the Washington columnist for the Financial Times, and before that worked at The Economist for more than 20 years, including 11 years as deputy editor. Crook writes about the intersection of politics and economics. More

Crook writes about the intersection of politics and economics.

We have ways of making you happy

By Clive Crook
Nov 13 2007, 1:21 PM ET Comment

Great news. 'Happiness research" might be having an effect on policy in just a few more decades, according to the New York Times. Instead of pursuing happiness, we will be entitled to it, and guided to it by wiser minds. 

The era of laissez-faire happiness might be coming to an end. Some
prominent economists and psychologists are looking into ways to measure
happiness to draw it into the public policy realm. Thirty years from
now, reducing unhappiness could become another target of policy, like
cutting poverty... [I]f the object of public policy is to maximize society’s well-being,
more attention should be placed on fostering social interactions and
less on accumulating wealth. If growing incomes are not increasing
happiness, perhaps we should tax incomes more to force us to devote
less time and energy to the endeavor and focus instead on the more
satisfying pursuit of leisure.

Thirty years gives me plenty of time to collect my own thoughts on the subject, assuming that's OK with the authorities. Meanwhile, Martin Wolf's take on the subject gives me a warm contented feeling. Why strive to say it any better? Spare me another intellectual arms race and all the negative externalities that go with it.

Where, then, does this new line of analysis take us? Personally, I find its philosophical and scientific underpinnings far from persuasive. But even if one goes along with it, the implications for policy seem far more ambiguous than social democrats believe. The findings are an assault on modernity itself, not just the forms of modernity the left dislikes.



I also see little here to undermine core principles of classical liberalism: people should be largely free to make their own choices, mindful of their obligations to others, except where those choices are harmful; gross domestic product should not be the overriding objective of policy; a big effort should be made to eliminate extreme poverty from the world; and the state should focus on remedying harms, while avoiding adding to them. But governments cannot make us happy. Happiness is something we have to pursue - and perhaps never find - for ourselves.



Presented by

More at The Atlantic

The Many Questions Surrounding Walmart's 'Great for You' Initiative Does Walmart Want What's Great For You?
In Minnesota, a School District Overturns Its Policy of Silence In Minnesota, a School District Overturns Its Policy of Silence
The 10 Best and 10 Worst States for High-Tech Business The 10 Best States for High-Tech Business
The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet The Fight for a Fair and Free Internet
Michigan: A Firewall for Romney—or the Bonfire of His Hopes? Michigan Will Decide the Fate of the GOP Race

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. If you’re not already logged in you will be asked to log in or register.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Special Report
Submit Your Photos of America at Work AP Submit Your Photos of America at Work
Send us your images of friends, family, and neighbors on the job. We'll publish the best. Read more ›
View All Correspondents

The Biggest Story in Photos

World Press Photo Contest 2012

Feb 15, 2012

Subscribe Now

SAVE 59%! 10 issues JUST $2.45 PER COPY

Facebook

Newsletters

Sign up to receive our free newsletters

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)

(sample)