That isn't an Onion headline. Mark Steyn was the interviewee. And his strange choice of emphasis merits scrutiny.
Their biggest legal triumphs have involved courts overruling legislatures to overturn longstanding precedents.
Its defenders are laboring to create that impression. In doing so, they're being unfair to some of the Supreme Court's conservative justices.
The only way to beat the broadcaster is to persuade his listeners he's wrong, not force him off the air while leaving his avid audience in place.
Rand Paul's stand in the Senate shows why non-interventionists should focus more on that body and less on the presidency.
Even though she's an ideological broadcaster, Maddow doesn't resort to demonization and hyperbole. It makes her case much stronger.
Right-wing outlets often fail to inform their audiences or set an agenda because they're too busy trying to counterbalance liberal coverage.
Win or lose at the Supreme Court, the GOP is likely to suffer at the ballot box as long as health is a central issue in future campaigns.
Forget strict constructionism. Does Obama's own belief that the Constitution is a living document argue for overturning his health-reform law?
It shouldn't be surprising that a man intent on banning salt and trans fats is also complicit in "stop and frisk" and illegal spying on Muslims.
He doubled down on a war that is wildly unpopular with Americans. On the other hand, Bin Laden is dead and Mitt Romney is waffling.
A new New York Times poll shows that more generous health insurance remains popular. Being forced to pay for it is less so.
Conservatives insist they're on the left. But has any liberal behaved worse than Newt Gingrich or Rush Limbaugh in the last decade?
Over the weekend a small group of protestors objected to the possibility of war with Iran. Will others follow their example?
Behold where narcotics prohibition leads a forthright advocate.
His cautious comments about the Trayvon Martin case were pitch perfect -- but calls for him to say more are misguided.
The Republican Party platform didn't mention the issue for more than 100 years. The fervor peaked in 1992. And it won't last much longer.
The 2008 document is at direct odds with how President Obama has governed. Changing it or leaving it the same would both be awkward.
This American Life has a lot more regard for its audience than Breitbart.com, where the standards are a disgrace.
I'd love to hear, just once in my life, a presidential candidate give a blunt and honest account of why he hasn't served.