If a CIA director's libido can make us less safe, maybe we should rethink the extent to which we rely on and empower the CIA.
She thinks Mitt Romney could've convinced voters that Democrats were primarily responsible for the housing crisis.
He says his co-ideologues are great at challenging their own orthodoxies. Can he give us some examples?
The talk radio host is the voice of a coalition totally oblivious to how its racially-charged rhetoric sounds.
Conservatives lobbied hard to install one of their own at the Washington Post. But it didn't work out as they imagined it would.
You'd expect him to be on his best behavior today. But look at the double standard he slipped into his mea culpa.
Nate Silver was right. His ideological antagonists were wrong. And that's just the beginning of the right's self-created information disadvantage.
A contributor at National Review unwittingly shows that tribalism means more to him than conservatism.
Long before the first primary vote was cast, Glenn Greenwald identified all the pathologies that would follow.
Brief thoughts on the popular vote, the media, the stakes, and more
The outcome is nearly certain. There won't be any Tuesday night suspense. But the winner still gets 55 electoral votes -- a fifth of what's needed for victory.
Defending costly executions, he writes that "justice should never be a matter of money." Will he follow that argument where it leads?
Hours-long election lines stretching many city blocks are a national embarrassment. And those responsible should be condemned across ideological lines.
They were horrified by Barack Obama's policies -- but only when they were described as Mitt Romney proposals.
In the political press, hacks and shills are among the biggest problems -- and they're unwilling to risk their own money on being right.
It's no wonder Andrew Breitbart's inheritors disagree about how to carry on his legacy -- his charisma masked many inconsistencies.
The New Yorker, The New York Times, and Jonathan Chait treat some of the most important issues in America as if they don't matter at all.
He supports policies that are an affront to the Constitution, can't possibly make good on his domestic agenda, and has terrible foreign-policy judgment.
Prudence counsels against choosing the height of a presidential campaign to evaluate the religion of the candidates -- especially the one you're against.