Remember When Judges Decided Elections After the Vote?
A Pennsylvania decision on voter ID begs the question Republican lawmakers have been asking for years: Why wait until after the election to skew the results? More »
Advertisement
Andrew Cohen is a contributing editor at The Atlantic, 60 Minutes' first-ever legal analyst, and a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice. He is also chief analyst for CBS Radio News and has won a Murrow Award as one of the nation's leading legal journalists. More
Andrew Cohen is a Murrow Award-winning legal analyst and commentator. He covers legal events and issues for CBS News' 60 Minutes and CBS Radio News and its hundreds of affiliates around the country. He is also a contributing editor at The Atlantic, where he focuses his writing upon the intersection of law and politics.He is the winner of the American Bar Association’s 2012 Silver Gavel Award for his Atlantic commentary about the death penalty in America and the winner of the Humane Society’s 2012 Genesis Award for his coverage of the plight of America’s wild horses. A racehorse owner and breeder, Cohen also is a two-time winner of both the John Hervey and O’Brien Awards for distinguished commentary about horse racing. Follow Andrew on Twitter at @CBSAndrew.
A Pennsylvania decision on voter ID begs the question Republican lawmakers have been asking for years: Why wait until after the election to skew the results? More »
It's not a conflict of interest. They have the time and the will to go to other events. So why haven't they paid a call to wounded veterans in years? More »
The Republican VP nominee is young, but the political debate between now and November is largely about how far back into history we want America to go. More »
For the first time since 1936, there are no wartime veterans on the United States Supreme Court. Here's hoping that changes -- soon. More »
In a fierce battle between prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges, guess who won? That's right, the judiciary. More »
How the State of Texas blew off a Supreme Court decision so it could execute a mentally retarded man. More »
A plea deal for the Tucson shooting makes sense for both sides. But an awful lot can happen between now and Tuesday's scheduled hearing in Phoenix. More »
After serious allegations of abuse and mistreatment at America's most famous federal prison, a touchy-feely memorandum looks like legal back-covering. More »
One prison doctor after another has diagnosed Marcus Druery as severely mentally ill. Does the Constitution permit the death penalty anyway? More »
America's most famous lawman, and arguably its worst, was on trial in Phoenix this week. His case could have changed the immigration debate -- if only we'd been able to watch it on television. More »
And, since 9/11, no amendment has been more equal than the Second Amendment. More »
Nine facts and one question about why we spend what we spend to prevent sudden deaths. More »
Carol Chambers will most likely seek the death penalty against Holmes. More »
Since 9/11, there have been an estimated 334,168 gun deaths in America. That's 100 times the 9/11 toll. So where's the urgency to do something? More »
As a lawsuit over the targeted killings of American citizens makes its way through the court system, three experts offer three different opinions. More »
Federal grazing fees are not a hot issue. But the Nebraska senator's new bill to bring them up to market rates is an astute political move. More »
Why do Republican leaders still play along with an informal Senate rule that prevents up-or-down votes on even those judges who have strong Republican support? More »
Texas and Georgia plan to execute two men next Wednesday -- one who has been deemed mentally retarded and another who shows signs of brain damage. More »
In this summer of discontent, a century after his birth, the great folk singer's message still matters. More »
A noted terror trial judge has a bright idea on how to safely and efficiently prosecute Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Is Washington ready to listen? More »
